The way in
Digital Authority Foundation
- What people find about you today, word for word, on Google and on four AI systems
- Why that is: the site, the sources, and the questions you stay silent on
- Your position beside the firms you lose work to
- What you do about it, in order of what returns the most
- A decision memo you can take to your partners
- Four deliveries, four conversations. Nothing is sent as a file
After that
Ongoing management
- The roadmap from the Foundation is carried out, not thought up again
- Visibility on Google and on the AI systems, actively managed
- Firm profile and personal profile, kept separately
- Competitor watch and external sources
- One point of contact, from research to delivery
Separate
Build work
- A new site, or the parts that are missing
- Quoted before anything starts
For scale
Larger arrangements exist, for firms with several partners and several practice areas inside the same system. Those come up when the Foundation shows they are needed, not before.
What you are paying for looks like this
The first chapter is the prompt comparison: the same question, put to four systems, side by side and word for word. Not summarised, not interpreted. This is what a client sees tonight.
ChatGPT
Names three firms. Yours is not among them. All three have a page on acquisitions with a case on it.
Gemini
Points to the bar association search. No firm named at all.
Claude
Names your firm, but under general corporate law. The specialism does not come through.
Perplexity
Names two, with sources attached. Both sources are a trade journal, not a firm's own site.
This is an example with an invented question and an invented outcome, to show what it looks like. Your own report carries the literal answers about your own firm.
Why there is no cheaper way in
There was one: a separate scan. It has deliberately been taken off. The Foundation IS the diagnosis, so two diagnoses side by side with a large gap in price cannot be explained and it cannibalises the entry.
There is no stopping point after the first delivery either. The first part is the most striking and the third is the most useful. Stopping after the first means stopping exactly when you have seen the most interesting thing and not yet the most usable one. You would have bought a fright instead of a decision.
What you can hold us to
Invoices without surprises
What we agree beforehand is what the invoice says.
Reachable after going live
The moment you need something is the moment it matters. You get a person, not a queue.
Free to stop, and everything stays yours
Domain, hosting, content, the site itself. Yours, during and after.
The Foundation is the only way in
One amount, in three instalments, and at the end there is a decision instead of a report.
Request the Foundation